The Only Bad Question is the One Left Unasked: Breaking Down Financial Jargon

by | Sep 5, 2024 | Financial, Investment | 0 comments

In the world of investing, one thing is clear: the only bad question is the one you don’t ask. It’s a simple but powerful premise that I base many of my articles on. There’s no shame in being unsure, confused, or just curious. The same applies to financial matters, so I’ll tackle questions many people are too afraid to ask in this blog post.

Before diving into today’s topic, let me ask: Have you ever watched Star Trek? If so, you’ve probably noticed the heavy use of “technobabble.” Terms like “dilithium core” or “tachyon fields” get thrown around to make the characters seem smarter and more futuristic. The financial world has its version of technobabble—otherwise known as financial jargon.

If you’ve ever tuned into CNBC or browsed an investment website, you’ve likely encountered terms that sound sophisticated but only add to the confusion. And while many of these terms are important, they often get thrown around more to sound impressive than to clarify. In this post, I’ll break down common financial jargon you’ve probably heard: stock ratings. We’ll look at what they mean and whether or not they matter.

Stock Ratings: What Do They Mean?

You’ve probably heard terms like “buy,” “sell,” “hold,” or “overweight” when experts talk about stocks. But what do these ratings actually mean?

A stock rating is essentially an analyst’s recommendation on what to do with a particular stock. Analysts arrive at these ratings by researching companies—looking at their financial statements, speaking with company leadership, studying market trends, and sometimes using complex algorithms to forecast the stock’s future performance.

The result of their analysis is typically condensed into a single word or phrase intended to provide quick, actionable advice for investors. The three most common ratings are “buy,” “sell,” and “hold”:

  • Buy: The analyst recommends purchasing the stock, believing it will perform well.
  • Sell: The opposite—suggesting it’s time to offload the stock.
  • Hold: Keep the stock, but don’t buy more, nor sell what you already have.

Seems straightforward, right? Well, not quite. Since there’s no universal standard for rating systems, firms often create their variations, which can add a layer of complexity. Here are some common terms you might encounter:

  • Overweight/Underweight: The analyst believes the stock will perform better (or worse) than the overall market.
  • Outperform/Underperform: The stock is expected to do better or worse than its peers.
  • Moderate Buy/Reduce/Add: Subtle variations that recommend buying or selling more stock, but not too much.
  • Strong Buy/Strong Sell: These indicate the analyst has a high level of conviction and recommends a significant action—buy or sell as much as you can.
a graphic of five golden stars to represent the question "do stock ratings matter?"

Do Stock Ratings Really Matter?

Let’s consider an analogy. Imagine you’re shopping for a new coffee maker. You hop online and look at customer reviews, where each product has some kind of rating, like 4.3 stars or 4.0 stars. Do you immediately buy the coffee maker with the highest rating? Probably not. You’ll use the rating as a starting point but then dive deeper—reading reviews, comparing features, and thinking about what suits your specific needs.

The same goes for stock ratings. They can be a helpful starting point, a way to filter out options, but they’re not the whole story. Here’s why:

  1. Ratings are opinions, not facts. A stock rating is just one analyst’s perspective; others might disagree. One firm’s “buy” might be another’s “hold.”
  2. There is no standardized system. Since each firm uses its own terminology and definitions, it’s important to understand that a “buy” from one analyst may not mean the same thing as a “buy” from another.
  3. They don’t take you into account. A stock rating is a generalized advice. It doesn’t factor in your unique goals, risk tolerance, or investment timeline—crucial to making a sound financial decision.

Use Stock Ratings as a Tool, Not a Crutch

Just as you wouldn’t buy a coffee maker based solely on a numerical rating, you shouldn’t make investment decisions based solely on a stock rating. Use it as one tool among many. Do your research, and always consider your financial situation.

Most importantly, don’t be afraid to ask questions, no matter how basic they might seem. Because when it comes to your financial future, the only bad question is the one left unasked.

The information in this material is not intended as tax or legal advice. It may not be used for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation.

The content is developed from sources believed to be providing accurate information. The information in this material is not intended as tax or legal advice. It may not be used for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation. This material was developed and produced by FMG Suite to provide information on a topic that may be of interest. FMG Suite is not affiliated with the named broker-dealer, state- or SEC-registered investment advisory firm. The opinions expressed and material provided are for general information, and should not be considered a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security.

Eric Riggenbach

Executive Director

I have been in the financial and insurance industry since 1990 and began my career while pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Business Management.

For the last 30 years, I have embraced further education by obtaining a Securities registration, and further education with a bachelor’s degree in economics and finance from Cambridge.